Football news
Journalist criticizes Diana Șucu for implying ownership of Rapid Bucharest
Costi Mocanu criticized Diana Șucu for comments suggesting her son plays for a personal club, arguing that owners are temporary administrators while fans are the true stakeholders.
1 min read
Photo credit
Photograph accompanying the original Golazo report.
Photo: Golazo · „Doamna Șucu greșește” Costi Mocanu, revoltat de mesajul soției patronului de la Rapid: „Să vedem dacă fiul joacă acolo unde nu este «tortul» familiei” · Cropped for display
Rapid Bucharest defeated Csikszereda 2-0 in a recent match. The 17-year-old Andrei Șucu was included in the starting lineup for the game.
Journalist Costi Mocanu criticized Diana Șucu for her message regarding her son's playing time. He described her intervention as inappropriate.
Mocanu stated that Diana Șucu made a mistake by implying ownership of the team. He noted that her phrases suggested her son plays for her personal club.
The journalist argued that football clubs belong to their supporters. He stated that owners are merely temporary administrators of entities built around a community.
Mocanu claimed Dan Șucu invested in Rapid Bucharest specifically because of its large fan base. He contrasted this with choosing clubs that have fewer supporters.
The commentator suggested that Diana Șucu's public comments create pressure on the coaching staff. He argued that these remarks complicate the situation unnecessarily.
Mocanu ironically questioned whether Andrei Șucu would play at a club not controlled by his family. He referenced interest from Galați in this context.
The journalist used a metaphor comparing Rapid Bucharest and Genoa to cakes owned by the Șucu family. He questioned which entity holds higher status in this comparison.
Don’t miss the next story.
Choose ScoreTransfer in Google’s source preferences to see more of our reporting.
Add as a preferred source on Google



